From TransGriot

“One of the tired memes I hear which gets repeated far too often is if a cisgender male dates a transwoman, he’s automatically slapped with the ‘gay’ label.” 

OK, weird syntax aside, I’m sure you all get where she’s coming from.  To the TeeGee Generation, transwoman  can be almost anyone who offers up gender variance.  It’s important to notice – here at least – that there is no mention of whether we are talking about pre-op, non-op, or post-op…just the word transwoman. 

TransGriot  goes on to say these choice items, all of which are hard to disagree with: 

“…one of the Prime Directives of our WPATH real life tests is that we blend in with society.” 

“Being a transperson also doesn’t stop our sex drives…” 

“Transwomen need love just like any other person walking Planet Earth.” 

“There have been some stunning looking transwomen over the last half century emerge from their cocoons to become beautiful butterflies. If they’re hetero oriented in their sexual orientation, they like going out on dates, revel in being in the company of men, getting candy, flowers, chocolate and enjoy getting intimate with them just like any other estrogen based lifeform.” 

“Since the male species that’s hetero oriented checks out the beauty first as a prelude to chasing the booty, these transwomen, like any beautiful woman do get attention from the male species.” 

But then comes the slow but inevitable slide into absolute absurdity, emphasis mine:

 

Sometimes it doesn’t matter whether we’ve had the surgery or not when they meet us. If we turn them on, they want to get to know us, and like us enough to want to get intimate with us, then nothing’s gonna stop it. 

“You also never know what a person likes to do in the bedroom once the door is closed, and it’s nobody’s business if that person likes a transwoman who just happens to have a neoclit in her panties.” 

And then my favorite: 

Are we supposed to let plumbing issues get in the way if we have found our soul mate and he doesn’t care about it? I think not.” 

It’s clear now that the focus of the essay is on pre-op  transwomen…but you all knew that all along, didn’t you?  So, the gist of this TransGriot  piece is that men who knowingly  date and become intimate with pre-op transsexuals are not necessarily gay.  I can agree with that, if  one defines bisexual as not  gay (reminds me of the difference between a bisexual man and a gay man…one blow job).  Nothing wrong with pre-ops dating, as long as they realize the men they date are at the least bisexual if the focus of that intimacy is the pre-op’s penis.

I only have my experience to draw from.  When I was pre-op I dated a lot…a whole lot…at least once a week and often two and three times a week…every  week.  I suppose I started dating as a means to validate my womanhood and ability to be attractive to men.  But, after a few years, and as GRS approached, by choice, I dated less and less.  I knew straight men didn’t date pre-ops and aside from the company of the men I dated while I was pre-op, I realized it was pointless.  The truth was I just didn’t enjoy being with men who wanted to be with me after knowing I was pre-op…and with no exceptions, I told every man I dated my status before we ever went out. 

I told every single man I ever went out with, no exceptions, that if they had even the very slightest of interest in the part of me that qualified me as being pre-op I was not in the least bit interested in going out with them.  I told them that if they saw me as anything but simply female to forget it.  And, lastly, I told them if I ever  sensed, even in the most miniscule of ways, that their focus was on my bits that would be the end.  I had no  interest in dates that were held on the premise of bi or homosexuality, even though I knew the men I went out with, even though to the one they claimed otherwise, were either bisexual or latently homosexual.  I was fortunate enough that men found me extremely attractive and I could afford to lay down the law…and I did. 

Every man I ever dated I met on straight on-line dating sites, which assured absolutely nothing but at least guaranteed they were not an out and proud homosexual; my profile listed me as a straight female; I always chatted with the men for weeks and weeks getting to know them before  telling them I was a pre-op TS, which I always did online as well.  Many of them, though we kept up with each other for extended periods of time, I only dated two or three times, nothing steady.  There were two men who I dated off and on for the entire five years I was pre-op.  I was out in California on a project when I had GRS.  A month or two after my surgery I got an e-mail from one of the two men informing me he was transgender…ugh.  The rest of the guys I dated and kept up with, including the other long termer (Leigh, who posts here, met this guy when we all went out one night in Dallas), never called me after they realized I had GRS…and that was a good thing.  That  should be a warning to those who get involved with so-called straight men when they are pre-op.  I never  allowed myself to become involved with men when I was pre-op…I had been warned by too many posties just like I’m doing now that the chances of any of those men sticking around after GRS was the slimmest of slim, bordering on none. 

Other than what Monica Roberts mentions on her blog I don’t know of her background.  But from what I gleaned she was a child of the Montrose gayborhood of Houston…hung out with the gay crowd…had an intersex roommate, etc.   In her essay she claims to have been watching the GLBT for 30 years so it’s not unreasonable to assume her experience with men is for the most part gay centric.  Well, the straight world is a whole lot different than Montrose and the GLBT.  Straight men don’t want a penis in bed with them…period.  Calling a penis a neoclitoris  is utterly and ridiculously absurd and an insult to every woman who ever lived, post operative transsexual or natal.  A penis, whether on a pre-op or a man is still a friggin penis.  Plumbing does  matter to straight men.  Men don’t want to buy a can of pineapple and upon opening it find they have really bought asparagus.  I sometimes think that the transgender activists really feel that if they are capable of saying or writing something that is all that is necessary for it be true.  Heterosexual men like vaginas; gay and bisexual men are attracted to the penis…what about that don’t they understand?  A penis is still a penis  whether you call it a neoclitoris, in a fit of non-op fantasy, or a gopher bone. 

If one who has had GRS meets a straight man, dates that man, gets to know that man…and then, and only then, after  all that prelude she tells the guy that she is post op and  still he sticks around…then one has the potential and chance  for happiness by being accepted as nothing more or less than a female.  The guy will have become interested and attracted to a woman…he dated that woman…and he got to know this woman as a woman, not a pre-op, not a post-op but simply a woman. 

I never wanted to be attractive to any  man if they were first and foremost attracted to me because I was trans anything.  And, I was certainly astute enough to know that any  man who knew up front that I was pre-op, when I was  pre-op, as every man I ever dated did when I pre-op knew, and was still interested in dating me after he knew I was pre-op had to have something way different than heterosexual male  going on inside that head of his.  A MtoF pre-op who thinks straight men will date them is only fooling themselves.  I can’t claim to know that every  MtoF pre-op who has allowed themselves to become involved with a man claiming to be straight is dropped like a weight after they have GRS, but I can say they are playing with fire…and invariably setting themselves up for a fall.

 

Sign THE PETITION…haven’t you had enough of the “neoclit crowd” and the TeeGee Generation?

31 Comments

  1. A few years ago, I worked with an AIDS prevention project targeting transgender women. A lot of the work involved black “transgender” people who were having sex with men. It quickly became obvious that a lot of these were really more gay than women, and that the whole transgender thing was a way of dealing with the stigma of being homosexual. Many blacks are extremely homophobic. This is sort of the flip side of the coin from those who are “on the down low.” The problem is, people like Roberts keep alive the idea that these are “just like transsexuals,” when they are not, and this has a negative impact on efforts to reach these people and assist them in dealing with HIV and AIDS. Not that Roberts cares…

  2. And yes, I agree completely with your comments about dating. I was a bit naive when I first started dating men, and it did not take long to figure out what was going on. I became involved with a man who I cared for deeply, but who was more interested in friendship with me. Our relationship was completely non-physical, and we remain friends. Ironically, he himself seems to have some issues. I think is actually attracted to me, but because of several issues, does not himself wish to admit this. I long ago gave up any hope of a relationship, but it is still a bit curious. Since I have had my surgery, none of the men I have dated has been aware (at least as far as I am aware) of my past. I suppose if things ever got to the point of discussing marriage I would have to tell, but otherwise I have no need or desire to tell.

  3. Very good read
    Lots of common sense,
    no nonsense.

    The dating thing is a no-brainier.

    I did very little dating; I have always let relationships come to me I have better success then chasing after them.

    Take Care
    S

  4. 151 Technorati ranking and a 2008 Weblog nomination versus your…what’s your ranking again?

    Still hatin he because you wish you could emulate me.

    TTFN WWBT’s

  5. Oh Please;
    I wouldn’t want to be you if my life depended on it.

    You are such a racist person beyond anything I can relate to.

    Bye
    (SA-ET DELETED 04-10-09)

    S

  6. “151 Technorati ranking and a 2008 Weblog nomination versus your…what’s your ranking again?”

    So by that logic, if we had the higher score, we would be right and you would admit that …yes?

    …oh and 30 years post op here .. what’s in your panties :)

    “Neoclit” .. ROFL

  7. I don’t think I want to even get close enough to see what is in her panties with a telescope.

    Gee Leigh;
    didn’t you know that numbers make you right regardless of what is logical?

    I have come to realize that in the GLBT, it’s not what you know that maters it’s who you (word that rimes with know) that gains you respect.

    Take Care
    S

  8. Sue..

    Yep .. perhaps we need to concentrate more on our Technorati rating …

    .. oh wait .. that would mean we would have to tell folks what they want to hear, regardless of the consequences to them ..

    Yeah .. I just can’t go that route.

  9. I don’t blame you Leigh;
    I could never whore myself out like that.
    I guess some people in the TG community are use to it.

    S

  10. The thing about the technorati rating is that it is influenced by links rather than agreement of the content.

    It is a ranking system similar to the way google works where the more websites that show a link to your domain, the higher you are scored. Further to that is the “popularity” score that gives you a higher ranking if those linkings are linked in from websites that themselves hold a higher ranking.

    Our own website here for instance contributes to transgriots overall score both in the fact that SA-ET provides a link to the content she is discussing in her article, AND, that Monica Roberts own comment above carries a link in her name back to Transgriot.

    All these links are counted toward the score and might lead someone to believe that it means that the website is popular and agreeable when in fact it does not take into account the reason the link exists and whether it is favorable to the content linked too.

    Therefore .. it inflates ego of the webmaster without really having justification .. but then we all know about transgender ego ..

  11. hi Leigh;
    You did a good job of explaining how that works.
    The system is flawed in that it is easy to game the system. In the Google ranking system if they catch you gaming them you end up being disqualified.

    On a another slightly related note;
    I’ve been following the nonsense over on bilerico. I wouldn’t expect helms to answer the latest challenge to the usefulness of TG activism, they don’t seem to be to eager to expose their sorrowful record in activism, or the damage they have done to us.

    Too bad Helms needs Father Toni to act as a shield.
    Helms just doesn’t have what it takes to stand up on (put your preferred pronoun here) own.

    See Y’all later;
    Take Care,

    S

  12. It is funny that Roberts wants to brag about having power and privilege since some claim one can only be a racist if one has power and privilege.

  13. Technorati Rating or not, queer Weblog nomination or not, a “neoclit” is still a penis…always will be…and males have that, not females. And if you, Monica, honestly think that anyone other than some in the GLBT (not all by a very, very long way) will ever think someone with a penis is female, well…you are an idiot and racist. As for wanting to emulate a 6′2″, black, homosexual crossdresser…ROFLMAO…I don’t think so, sweetpea.

  14. You know
    I keep waiting for Monica and other TG-Activists to list their accomplishments, those achievements that benefit TG/TS folk.

    All I hear are Crickets………………………………………………………..

    Seems to me Leigh you did what I have done once before and have received the same response.
    Crickets……………………………………..

    Could it possibly be they know they have done more, far more damage than good?

    Could it be the TeeGee activists have Nothing to show for their hard work?

    Do ya Think?

    S

  15. Well Sue .. Like I said over at Bilerico, I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for that list.

    Of course, I knew they could not produce a list of accomplishments for strictly trans indviduals, because they have none.

    The only thing they have to show for all this activism in the past 10 years is same sex marriage rights in four states and some patchy areas of the country where large corporations and some state city workers get favorable treatment.

    Same sex marriage really doesnt apply to most transsexuals anyway since if they are lesbian and born male, they could have married their girlfriends anyway. If they are hetero and post, then they wouldn’t want to marry a gay male and most hetero men are not gonna want to call it a same sex marriage .. so the whole marriage issue is busted for trans anyway.

    They will contend though that they have made headway with employers, but to be fair those employers are usually the big time corporations, and the employees in question are usually skilled enough that they are valuable to the company no matter how they dress. As for city and state workers, well hell nobody gets fired from the city and state unless they murder the mayor!

    So in reality, you’re right. The negatives they have bought down on all trans people far outweigh any positive action they may have accomplished, and of course for most of the post ops out there it’s all bad news.

    Happy Easter to all you religious folk, I think I might catch religulous this weekend, bit more my speed :)

  16. They cannot even attack the marriage correctly.
    There is an interesting history here in the US regarding marriage and the relatively recent involvement by the government in said activity. They don’t even know the difference between a privilege and a right, legally speaking.

    Have a good weekend however you choose to spend it. I’ll be spending some time with a friend.
    Take care
    S

  17. One of the funnier things about Roberts is how said person cannot deal with disagreement without insults. Roberts never presents any intelligent debate, just cheap insults. Sad really, but not surprising. That does seem to be classic among transgenders. They either condescend, suggesting that one just needs to understand “sociology” or “anthropology” better (does it ever occur to them that someone might be well read, and just not accept the same views) or they attack.

  18. Oh, and when attacks or insults don’t work. they erase all the disagreememt and block anyone who actually presents valid arguments.

  19. MR also seems to not be able to cast even a simple insult without it being spiked with racism.
    I wonder what Blogger’s policy is regarding racism. Unlike Helms who’s blog is a part of Marti Abernathy’s domain MR must answer to people with somewhat conventional values.

    Take care
    S

  20. Yes, that is a good point, and an interesting question…

    On the other hand, I don’t know that I want to lower myself to Roberts’ level and start playing censorship games. I think it is good that her hatred is expose to to all.

  21. How does this person have any idea what being a lesbian is like?
    http://www.monicahelms.com/blog/sex/stuck-in-loneliness.htm#more-565

    Stuck in Loneliness?
    More like Stuck in Delusion.

    Take care
    S

  22. Some made a rather good point in a comment in response to the second “installment” on Bilireco. People like Helms are just seeking attention and, if the world suddenly changed and they were the norm, they would probably become straight, normal men.

  23. I could believe that from Helms. Our brief encounter three and a half years ago was very enlightening.

    I haven’t been following that installment as closely, you know how I feel about the binary, and some traditional institutions. :)

    I have a few free minutes I shall go and check it out.

  24. Anybody watching the Angie Zapata murder trial?

    S

  25. “How does this person have any idea what being a lesbian is like?”

    I have to wonder if you do?? What is being a lesbian like?? Is it the same for everyone?? Is there a set of rules and regulations??
    Or ……… is having always been attracted to woman not enough??
    But then again, I probably don’t fit your definition for being a woman!!??

  26. The person in question, the has a history of calling women of operative history men.
    That is why I brought up the question.

    As to rather “you” fit my idea of what a woman should be, give me a link to your blog, show me where else you post and we shall find out.

    It is not possible to judge a person on one post.

    S

  27. The only blog I have is on Eons. Search for “Phedre”. Also have posted on Catholic Answers Forum as “hyflyer64″. Sueliz is familiar with my posts.

    I’m not familiar with Monica Helms, however her comments re: loneliness struck a cord. My story is similar to many who are considered “late transitioners”. Jenny Boylan comes to mind.
    To make a long story short, at age 59, I reached a point where I could no longer continue to maintain the facade that I had been and I finally embarked on a 4 year journey to arrive at a place that I felt I should always have been.
    I never felt that I was a woman or that I wanted to be one. Only that I would have been better off having been born as one and finally, after a period of time the realization that I always should have been one. And yes, women do not have a penis, and it became a matter of having it surgically removed by an expert under sedation or removing it myself. I decide to go with the “expert”!! :-)
    The problem was that I had been with the same woman for over 40 years, and we had two wonderful children and I’ve never known anything other than women in my life.
    I’m now 66 years old. I’m a flight attendant with a major airline. On my own for the first time in my life, for 3 years now. Men interest me. I wonder, as I did before surgery, what it is like to be made love to. However, I find myself more comfortable with women. Also, there’s the religion aspect. ( you need to read the CAF posts )
    So, I’m trying to come to terms with and learning to cope with “being alone”.
    Again I ask, what is it like to be a lesbian??
    Do you go along with my church and feel that my surgery was only superficial and that I’m still a man with a psychological issue!!??
    I’ve asked myself time and time again, why did I not arrive at this point 40 plus years ago??
    Obviously, I don’t fit the “classic/true Transexual” model. At least, not as defined on this blog. And several of my friends don’t either. However, we are what we feel we should always have been and are trying to make the best of the years we have left.
    Are these issues so black and white??

  28. I think there is a misunderstanding about the nature of having a transsexual condition. I know it puts me at odds with a few people but my personal view is that it makes the best sense, at this point in time, to restrict the definition to what is scientifically tenable. This, in turn, will lead it to be medically ‘tenable’, and put an end to the confusion.

    What this means is that it might be a good idea to avoid talking about this in terms of gender at all. To me, transsexual describes the condition of having two parts of your body that don’t operate well together. Specifically, a part of the brain is at variance with another part of the body, or perhaps the majority of the body as the brain ’sees’ it.

    If you have a transsexual condition, it will be reflected in the attitude you have towards your body. It begins as discomfort, and if untreated you eventually end up with hatred and loathing for your own form. The moment after surgery, a great deal of the distress should disappear instantly. That is all ‘transsexual’ is about at the individual level.

    I find it a little troubling that you put the surgery in terms of ‘removing the penis’. I can’t speak for others, but I never saw it that way. I saw it as giving me something I didn’t have before. A vagina is an organ in its own right, it is not a ‘lack of a penis’ as so many people seem to think.

    If you want to put sociological terms on the condition, there is a part of the brain that develops along a ‘female’ path and it doesn’t map ‘male’ development very well. This produces profound distress in a person, and can often lead one to feel you are going mad as time goes on. And this is a treatable condition.

    I think it’s important to keep this simple in order to avoid these nasty discussions about who is really ‘a woman’ and all that nonsense. These kinds of postmodernist arguments dissecting language produce little of value, and only allow certain people to obfuscate and point fingers at who is oppressing them. This is a medical problem, not a political free-for-all.

    So my answer to your question is that if you are happy, you are living life well and it doesn’t matter if you have one or another medical conditions at birth. One thing you should consider is how much weight you put on the uninformed opinions of people in your church who try to tell you who you are. The depth of most people’s understanding of their own condition is shallow, and when they try to put that understanding on someone like you, who has actually gone beyond and questioned their paradigm, it is a case of the blind leading the not-so-blind. You know more than they do already.

    Don’t worry about sexual orientation, it will work itself out. The only thing you need to do is make yourself comfortable with who you are. As you know, we can’t force ourselves to be what we are not.

    It might help if you try to divorce yourself from thinking of things in discrete terms like being a ‘classical transsexual’ or ‘a lesbian’. These things are meant to be descriptors but the way our minds work we tend to feel that they are states of being that describe the whole of a person. Our brains turn people into simple objects for easy classification, and this process dehumanizes us.

    If you are with a woman, you are simply with a woman. There is no greater meaning to it than that. You don’t suddenly turn into some strange creature known as ‘a lesbian’. =) Ditto with the idea of ‘being made love to’. I know that it is common parlance and probably generational, but you still have just as much right to say you are making love to someone as you ever did. :)

    I could go on and on but that is probably enough preaching for one post.

    • “I find it a little troubling that you put the surgery in terms of ‘removing the penis’. I can’t speak for others, but I never saw it that way. I saw it as giving me something I didn’t have before. A vagina is an organ in its own right, it is not a ‘lack of a penis’ as so many people seem to think.”

      As you saw in my post, I had been married for 40+ years. I thought that I would continue to be and having a vagina that I wouldn’t be using, was not my motivation for GRS. I was at a point where I could not stand to see myself in a mirror unless I was wearing something covering my genitals. I showered wearing a thong. :( So for me it was more of a metter of getting rid of something that did not belong on me and that I could not stand to have.
      Unfortunately, things didn’t work out re:continuing to live with my spouse!
      And ……….. thank you for your supportive comments.

  29. hyflyer64;

    I am somewhat acquainted with your religion; I can say I think they should go back and read their own Bible and pay particular attention to the parts in the Old Testament regarding what to do about parts of one’s body one has an issue with. GOD says to take care of it, implying you are the one who must live with it.
    (I forget what book that is in My ex roommate who is TG went to Dallas Seminary college)

    You may be confusing me with someone else I never spoke or removing anything, simply having the birth defect corrected.

    I don’t buy into the Transgender construct of gender I do think that aspect has a lot fewer shades of gray than what the TGs would have us believe.

    I have known many late transitioners the desire to conform to your birth sex and gender role is strong and I don’t think anybody should be faulted for when they decided they couldn’t live in their assigned sex and gender role. In terms of the church and these issues the lay folk are not well informed at all and don’t understand that while GOD doesn’t make mistakes it is a mistake for them to couch your condition in their limited understanding, It is a sin. All you can do is just forgive them for their ignorance.

    Sexual orientation I feel is between you, GOD and your partner. I have never felt should be something that should be part of daily polite conversation with strangers or part of a political statement. I really feel this pride crap is for the birds.

    You do have to be yourself and I feel strongly that our place in the mainstream not in some gay or transgender ghetto.

    Take care
    God Bless
    S

    • Well, the Catholic Church is not about to change it’s tune on this subject. Not in our lifetime.
      I agree with most of what you say. When I first started my journey, I would go to a place in Vermont that catered to the TG crowd but never felt comfortable. I always felt that the others were just a bunch of guys wearing dresses!! I mentioned that to my councilor and she told me that I was mistaken.
      She was right!! Out of a dozen or so “regulars”, 4 have transitioned besides me. ( I was not a regular )
      One in particular, was very flamboyant. The life of the party. Around 40, divorced because of her CD issues. Had her own web site. I liked her but felt that she was there to get her kicks CDing. TG all the way!!
      She had her surgery ( surgeries ) before I did and is now not recognizable from who she was. She’s actually quite beautiful. She had the money to get all the best. The web site is gone and she has been living with her boyfriend for 3 years or so.
      That is why I ask if things are so “black and white”??.
      You wont find me at “pride” anything but is there anything to be gained bashing this person and that one, even if they started it first??
      It seems so silly. ‘She/he said this so this is what I think of them, etc. etc.’

      I stoped posting on CAF because I couldn’t see where we ( HBS and post-HBS suferes ) were making a bit of diferrence. We did get a few people to re-evaluate there thinking but in the grand scheme of things, it hasn’t and wont make a diff.
      And I see the same thing here. As SA-ET has stated, the majority of “classic/true Transexuals” have faded into the mainstream and are still doing so. There not reading and or posting on here, or anywhere else for that matter. The only reason I found this blog was because of SA-ET posting on CAF and directing me to her blog.
      Maybe I’m just missing the point!!??


Post a Comment

*
*