Apparently only two of us picked up on THIS COMMENT Jillian Weiss made  over at Bilerico with regard to THIS ARTICLE about the recent IRS ruling recognizing GRS as a medically justified and allowing for the expenses of it to be deducted on one’s income tax return, underlined and italic emphasis mine:

“I am ambivalent about this ruling. We should think carefully before embracing it. I’m glad for Rhiannon, but I’m not sure whether I’m glad for the whole LGBT community. I also assume that the case may be reviewed by higher courts, and that may change the calculus significantly.”

Radical Bitch had, in part, THIS RESPONSE to Ms. Weiss:

“Jillian, the entire LGB community has nothing to do with this decision. It is not about sexual orientation, it’s about whether or not transsexuality and it’s treatments are legitimate medical ones. Period.

Frankly this is a political consideration screwing with medical ones to view it in light of greater LGB considerations and defies all logic to see it in any other light.”

My REPLY was a tad more incredulous:

“…I’m not sure whether I’m glad for the whole LGBT community.”

Huh!!!

What in the world does this IRS decision possibly have to do with the whole LGBT community?

Or, for that matter, what has this even got to do with that sizable percentage of the transgender who are not surgery tracked?

This decision has nothing to do with sexual orientation (LGBT)…nothing whatsoever…so why can’t surgery tracked transsexuals simply stand on their own in this matter without input from the whole LGBT community?

No, I didn’t get an answer to my questions.

I first wrote about those who are intersexed in a piece entitled The GLB’s Sexualization of Transsexualism and IntersexualityWhen I wrote that piece I wanted to make very sure that whatever it was I wrote about intersexuality was as accurate as possible…there are almost a dozen links in that piece to information concerning intersex alone and the conditions they experience. 

Now, I think it’s only human nature for someone to want the know the reason why they are what they are; specifically, why someone experiences what is, for lack of a better term, gender dysphoria.  I am always skeptical of one’s motivation when I read statements to the effect of what difference does it make.  Obviously it makes no difference, per se.  However, to me, there is a big difference in someone saying they don’t know why they are what they are…and in one saying they don’t care why nor have in any interest in why they are what they are.  Again, it seems to be a trait of normal human curiosity to want to find a reason for aberration from the norm, particularly when the aberration is one’s own self.  

Also, to me, there is a huge difference in one saying they don’t care why but certainly would want to know why…and someone simply saying they don’t care why outright and dismissing the entire issue with a casual wave of the hand.  In other words, one who is not consumed with why they are, or are not…but would like to know, if they couldwhy they are, or are not…is not the same as someone who simply says they don’t care one way or the other.  Wanting to know why one falls into an extremely small percentile of the overall population of the planet just seems a given to me. 

With the above as a premise, there are some on the net whose search for the reason they are what they are does seem to border on the obsessed.  With some, it is almost impossible to go to any thread without reading their more than strange narrative; honestly, I can almost quote one of these narratives verbatim I’ve read it so many times.    One in particular holds herself up repeatedly as an authority by nature of being a scientist (though not one involved in hard biophysiological research associated with sex/gender) and is always most careful to blur her narrative into some variation of nature does not like absolute certainty.  Predictably, this allows her to justify her story as a singularity of sorts.  This person was assigned male at birth, was male bodied, was raised as a male, married a female, has admittedly fathered a child, and has XY chromosomes…yet goes to the wall in claiming in no uncertain terms that she is intersexed…when nothing appears further from reality. 

Quite honestly, should I choose to, for I have the same general background, I could also claim to be a scientist just as the person above does.  Though I am anything but obsessed, I have read more than my fair share of the scientific research on transsexual and intersex conditions over the past 45 years or so.  I don’t claim to be, because I am not, a molecular biologist, but I whole heartedly agree that there are human biological aberrations/abnormalities/differences in which humans do not develop into strict XX females and XY males.  I also completely agree, and think the scientific literature unmistakably bears this out, that humans (both male and female) can and do undergo spontaneous hormonal fluctuations, sex or otherwise, that may affect them physically.  I do not, however, believe that anyone undergoes a spontaneous biophysiological epiphany that changes them from an otherwise normal, male bodied, fertile, XY male into someone who is intersexed.  I also do not believe that even if spontaneous biological changes led to the very extreme of physiological manifestations of the opposite sex much later in life that that, in itself, would lead someone to have desire sex change surgery if they had a solid sex/gender identity in the first place…for their is no scientific evidence.  To justify such as nature not being ordered/predictable or the product of a biophysiological singularity is simply disingenuous.

If one is inclined to follow the links in the first article I wrote/reference above and/or scour the internet in their own research, they will find a few available facts about intersex they just might not be aware of.  Among them are: 

There is no clear cut definition of intersex; the different types of conditions associated with intersex largely depend on the definition that is adopted. 

Some who specialize in the intersex field of science do not consider chromosome aberrations, in and of themselves, such as 47, XXY (Kleinfelter’s Syndrome) to even be an intersex condition. 

Most who are intersex do not even know they are classified as such. 

Most who are intersex, regardless of what definition is used, do not have gender identity issues. 

Most intersex are heterosexual. 

And, that leads us to the wierd claims that some who are transsexual make with regards to their being intersex.  Let me point you an essay at Women Born Transsexual by Andrea Brown entitled Bizarre Intersex Claims. 

 

 

Last Friday, I posted briefly on having my e-mail account compromised.  That same day, I updated that post to say that I had regained access to my account and that things were all better.  Well…as it turned out, things were anything but…all better.  It’s a long story; below is an e-mail I sent out mid day yesterday to everyone on my contact list that will help explain: 

Read More »

Often, it seems, just sitting back and watching a glorious bloom of absurdity is all it takes to prevail.  It’s easy to forget that some get it.

I thought about commenting, but felt I had a better chance at solving the mysteries of nuclear fusion or interplanetary teleportation than convincing even one person on this site to change their mind about THIS.  I‘d rather debate a red brick than waste my time.

UPDATE  01-29-30

Microsoft validated my ownership of my compromised e-mail account, disabled it, and then sent a link so that I could reset the password and regain control.  This resulted in me regaining access and control of my mail account.  I can’t tell you all how relieved I was.  I have had that account for years; many people I keep up with have no other means of keeping in touch with me.  I want to thank those of you who e-mailed me with data.  I particularly want to thank Ms. Sharon Gaughn at TS-Si for her offers of assistance and help; it was very much appreciated.  As far as I know, some fourteen contacts of mine either called or e-mailed me they had received the phish from the perpetrator of the scam.  They subsequently e-mailed me the e-mail they received and I forwarded that on to Microsoft.  The evidence was overwhelming and, to Microsoft’s credit, true to their word, within 24 hours of the compromise, my account was disabled from the hijacker and I reestablished access and control.

Thanks to all who helped…you know who you are.

SA-ET  01-29-10

 

I’d rather not get into how my e-mail account became compromised; suffice to say, due to a phishing scam, it did.

So, most of yesterday was spent presenting Microsoft with every possible bit of information I could think of that would convince them of the following:

a) my e-mail accont had been compromised,
b) the password had been changed,
c) that I was no longer able to enter or control my e-mail,
b) and, pleading with them to disable the account,
d) and then send me the link so that I could reset the password and regain control/access to it.

I’m still waiting for an answer as to what they are going to do; so far I’ve been unsuccessful. Whether I can prevail in regaining control of my account will largely depend on whether I can absolutely prove that I am the legitimate owner of the account and that it has indeed been compromised.  Think about how hard it would be to convince the admins of your e-mail account that you are who you say you are and that the people who are running your e-mail account are not who they say they are when you opened your account twelve years ago, can’t remember the zip code of where you were when you opened it, your password has been changed, the answer to your secret question has been changed, and your alternate e-mail address has been changed.  Don’t get me wrong, I do not fault Microsoft for scrutinizing closely what I’m saying, after all, they are only doing what they would also do to someone who was using them to compromise my account in the first place…and, in this case, Microsoft has no responsibility for the compromise; it is entirely my fault that this happened.  Nonetheless, I am still waiting to regain control of my e-mail…hopefully I will hear from them today.

What has been the outcome of the compromise?  I have gotten numerous phone calls from many close to me who have receive e-mails from “me” that say the following:

Hi,
How are you doing today?.I am really sorry to bother you with this email but i just want you to know what i am facing right now.I am sorry that i didn’t inform you about my traveling to London UK for a Seminar,i am presently in London now but unfortunately for me i lost my wallet in a taxi where my money and other valuable things were kept.I will like you to assist me with a loan of $3000 or whatever you can afford urgently to sort-out my hotel bills and get myself back home. I promise i will pay you back as soon as i return.Kindly let me know if you can be of help so that i can send you the details you will use to send the money to me here in London.

Any assistance you can offer will be greatly appreciated.

Notice the grammar and punctuation/lack of punctuation.  Everyone who has called me recognized right away that this did not come from me.  One can imagine how embarassing this could be…as the perpetrator of this fraud has access to my entire e-mail contact list and is likely to mail most, if not all, of them this request.  It’s a nightmare.

Some who have commented here (you know who you are) are indeed on my e-mail contact list and could conceivably receive such an e-mail.  If you do, please neither respond nor delete it.  I would ask that you please FORWARD the e-mail to a temporary e-mail account that I have set up in order to capture just such e-mails and forward them to Microsoft for their investigation…make sure the header is included.  The address of my temporary mail account is DELETED 01-29-10 SA-ET (NOTE:  I ask that you only use this address for the purpose I requested.  (As soon as this issue is rectified, one way or the other, this e-mail account will be permanently closed.)

Sorry if this causes any of you any inconvenience.

I was glancing at the Let my people go petition site.  If you all will recall, the Let my people go site is a petition to GLADD that says: 

“We the undersigned demand you stop representing us as part of a group which we share absolutely nothing in common.  Drop all references to transsexuality being included under the term transgender immediately, revise your media alerts to acknowledge this and in the future consult actual people of transsexual history when you are claiming to represent them.  That we are forced to take this step with an organization dedicated to stopping defamation is inexcusable.” 

In other words, this is a petition from those who want nothing to do with being included under the transgender umbrella. 

Reading the comments that many made while signing the petition, it seems there are transsexuals from 26 United States/District of Columbia and 13 foreign countries that do not think very much at all of the transgender thing.  One could say it’s a universal feeling shared by many transsexuals all around the world, both MtoF and FtoM.  Those who signed this petition most obviously do not want anything whatsoever to do with being trans…only male or female.  Presumptuously, the vast majority who signed this petition assuredly are post operative transsexuals.  

I have always been amazed at the locations of those who took the time to sign it.  I decided I’d do an elementary analysis of “how many from where” on it.  Below is the scoop, sorted by the numbers, descending.  Note that though the site says that 158 have signed the petition, only 143 names are actually there.  Evidently, those who tried to undermine the effort were deleted.  There may not be hoards who have rushed to sign up and say no to the transgender construct…but, then again, there are way, way more than just four or five too…and, it appears from the dates on the petition, the numbers who have voiced their disapproval of transgender just keep steadily trickling in…one here, a couple there…slowly but surely growing and growing.

 

California                       15                   United Kingdom                         18

New York                       11                   Canada                                      13

Washington                    6                     Germany                                     7

Georgia                           5                     Australia                                     4

Texas                              5                     Ireland                                        4

Florida                            4                     New Zealand                               3

Oregon                           4                     Norway                                       2

Wisconsin                       4                     Columbia                                    1

Connecticut                    3                     Italy                                            1

Michigan                         3                     Mexico                                        1

North Carolina               3                     Saint Kitts and Nevis                  1

Pennsylvania                3                       Spain                                          1

Colorado                        2                     Sweden                                       1

Maine                             2

Montana                         2

Rhode Island                 2

Tennessee                     2

Washington DC             2

Alabama                        1

Arizona                          1

Illinois                            1

Maryland                        1

Massachusetts               1

Nevada                           1

Ohio                                1

South Dakota                 1

The rise of Germany and the National Socialist German Worker’s Party (NSDAP) after WWII has generally been attributed to three criteria: 

1.  An overwhelming majority shamed, beaten down, and humiliated by the Allies at the end of WWI; a society thrown into political and economic chaos after the war and a populace determined to reject the 1919 Treaty of Versailles and “…once again take their place in the world…” only requiring political leadership to meet that end. 

2.  Brute force, both domestically and militarily, instituted by the NSDAP and its leader, Adolph Hitler. 

3.  The Big Lie, which lead to the de facto sanctioning of NSDAP policies by the German people. 

I’ve written of the Big Lie before, but as a refresher, it was a term coined by Hitler while writing Mein Kamph.  Hitler defined the Big Lie in Mein Kamph as a lie so big, so blatant, so outrageous that no one “…could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.”  In other words, a lie so big that no one would question it for whoever would say such a thing certainly must be telling the truth.  Hitler had this to say about the concept of the Big Lie: 

“All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true in itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.” 

Though Hitler verbalized the Big Lie, Joseph Goebbels, the NSDAP Reich Minister of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, implemented it.  For Goebbels, the practical definition of the Big Lie was such that, emphasis mine: 

“if those in authority repeat an outrageous falsehood over and over, and there is no countervailing voice exposing this big lie to the public, or if that voice is censored by the media, the big lie is likely to be believed.” 

Implicit in the Big Lie concept is intimidation, and this runs rampant on the internet.  If a minority group is accused, based on their stance, of being the devil incarnate by the majority in a stated Big Lie, it places the minority in a defensive position that calls for either rebuttal or capitulation in the face of even more Big Lies by the majority.  As an example, when a minority group offers a “countervailing voice exposing a big lie to the public” they more likely than not bear the brunt of even more Big Lies by the majority.  At that point, the minority have two choices:  1) they can defend themselves, perpetuating the majority’s feedback, or 2) they can capitulate in the face of a withering onslaught.  Either choice is driven by intimidation on the part of the majority.

Read More »

I wonder if the transgender/GLB activists realize how they appear to the very vast majority they are attempting to persuade of their legitimacy…as well as to the merits of their cause?  

I’ve had a busy week.  Yesterday was a busy day.  As I write this, I’m awaiting a call from a contractor we’ve secured to install some outdoor carpet on our patio.  But, as busy as I’ve been this week, over the past few days I decided to catch up on some of what is going on all over the blogosphere, a decision partly made when I recognized Enough Non-Sense had been linked last week to a blog post entitled One hundred trans related blogsThere, in plain site, were the links to trans related blogs…a one stop shopping type of thing.  So, I checked a bunch of them out…the biggies, the obscure, and those blogs linked to the biggies and the obscure.  Now, when I want to get the gist of a blog site, I scan the blog looking for the blog post that got the most comments…and then I read that blog post and the comments associated with it.  If a comment jumps out at me, either because it is way good or way stupid, if there is a link to the commenter’s site I follow that link and then take the same approach.  Taking a good long look at many, many of the transgender related blogs (not just some of the more well known ones), was an interesting if not downright mesmerizing experience.  

Though I certainly wasn’t interested enough to keep track, many, if not most, of the trans related sites I visited were owned by one of several categories of transgender:  younger, preop/nonop, and had transitioned within the last couple of years, or older, preop/nonop and had transitioned within the last couple of years.  A very few were owned by older, preop/nonop with claims to have fully transitioned over ten years ago!  Very few of the sites were owned by post operative transsexuals. 

Of the sites I visited, several things jumped out at me.  One was that a very large number of the blogs I visited were owned by male-to-female lesbians involved with other male-to-female lesbians…either preop, nonop, or post op.  Though I realized that there were a lot in this type of relationship, it seems there were way more than I thought would be in that vein.  Many of the owners, particularly those who were younger seemed to have no life other than that of the blogosphere.  Many were gamers.  A lot were into anime’.  Most didn’t have a job or, at most, were getting by hand-to-mouth.  Almost all felt they were discriminated against. 

Almost all seemed to have issues of some sort.  Many of the blogs seemed to absolutely scream anger.  Though there were exceptions (in what I know is a futile effort to prevent being slammed, I have intentionally not mentioned blog names), it was easy to get the impression that many of the blogs were written by angry young males convinced that the number of curse words used was directly proportional to the blog post’s credibility. 

More than a few of the blogs seemed to not recognize the concept of objectivity nor recognize that there is more to the world (and world opinion) that just their self centered view of it.  In almost every blog post I read, no one who disagreed with the stated premise was given any slack.  In fact, many of the blog owners said upfront that they would delete and ban anyone who disagreed with them. 

Not a small group of these same blogs were owned by individuals who admitted freely to having some form of psychological issue (often deep seated) aside from the psychosocial issues associated with being transgendered.  Only a very few did not feel they were victimized in some way.  In fact, the “woe is me” mindset permeated much of the writing.  The take away from reading this general theme in many of the blogs was that the author had a “it’s not me, it’s you” approach, unable to factor in their own admitted short comings. 

Bona fides were big.  It was not uncommon at all to read blogs (or find the person’s comments on other blogs) in which the author’s credentials, history, and/or claim to fame were continuously rolled out, often verbatim time and time again, in order to boost their integrity and authority on any given subject.  The rallies, or conventions, or political events the person attended were listed…as though just their sheer participation in these get-togethers somehow afforded them an insight into transgender issues that others did not have. 

Ego inflators and self aggrandizement ran rampant on a few of the blogs.  Often these life embellishments ran to the absurd.  One blogger, who has become somewhat of a joke as of late, has alternately claimed at one time or the other to have a doctorate degree in the social sciences, to have taken the Bar exam, to be a psychological therapist, the author of several published books with two on the way, a venture capitalist contact, the independent owner of at least two companies (claiming to have sold the first one for $275,000 and the second for over a $1,000,000), a former Phoenix, Arizona judge, an artist, feminist, computer whiz, an advisor to the Republican party, a diversity trainer, and even an undercover narcotics officer…to name a few.  Yet she readily admits she doesn’t have a pot to pee in nor the money to buy one.  Having transitioned only a couple of years ago, clearly this person is living a life of imaginative fiction. 

Many of the blogs seem to show neither appreciation nor recognition of the fact that others in their circle are either way ahead of them on their gender spectrum or way behind.  The mindset is strictly “community”…the sun seems to rise and set based on that camaraderie. 

A sizable number of the blogs are laced with what has been called “I Am” Syndrome reinforcing the self-centered approach mentioned above.  It is not unusual at all to read over and over and over again both in these authors’s blog and comments about what they are.  “I am a bitch.”  “I am an anarchist.”  “I am mean and nasty.” “I am (fill in your own word).”  Issues…come to mind. 

One of the things that absolutely amazed me is the network that some of the more obscure blogs have developed.  Many of these blogs have a huge and varied readership with it not being unusual for 60-100 (or more) sympathetic comments showing up on their site routinely. 

One thing that’s really impressive in a sad sort of way and that is the position from which the vast majority of the bloggers speak from and the apparent lack of self esteem when they do so.  Many of the blog owners are clearly lacking any formal education; most have transitioned only within the last several years.  By nature of being new to the transition process (say three years or less) and being preop/nonop, by virtue of their lack of experience alone they are limited in what they can attest to…instead they are chained to the internet in order to enhance their knowledge while simultaneously falling victim to not knowing what they don’t know.  Yet they argue and debate their points amongst themselves with a vigor that has to be seen to fully appreciate…and they haven’t the least interest in entertaining the position of those of us with a significant history, many of whom, me included, have left the gender debate.  To compensate for this lack of history, in itself not a bad thing, it seems important to this group to present their arguments and discussion with an air of intellectualism that is often grown from the seeds of other blogs.  Often the blog posts are for all intents and purposes no more than plagiarized or slightly modified versions of other posts on other blogs.  And they are always chocked full of the transgender catch words du jour…homophobia, transphobia, fail, meme, ifist, ableist, sexism, conflation, privilege, cissexism, intersextionalism, oppressive,  erasure, discrimination, etc.  Add to that the use of unnecessarily complex words (more often than not used incorrectly) to explain fairly simple concepts and the result can often lead a reader to simply question what in the heck the author is trying to say.  The arguments often don’t make sense, while ending up circular, confusing, and meaningless.  The other day, one comment made by the founder of a well known national transgender organization, a long term nonop, cracked me completely up.  When questioning the mental state of a previous commentator and antagonist on one of the major GLBT blogs, this trans activist said:  “…, she is clearly diluted.”  I’d like to think this person knows the difference between diluted and deluded…I’d like to think that. 

All in all, a bloody mess. 

So, the question is still out there: I wonder if the transgender/GLB activists realize how they appear to the vast majority they are attempting to persuade of their legitimacy…as well as to the merits of their cause?     

I don’t know.  I do know how they appear to me though. 

What about you folks?

01-18-10 UPDATE :

OK…we went to see Avatar.  The theatre we chose was the Houston Edwards Marq*ee located on the I-10, Katy Freeway feeder road in west central Houston.   Before the movie, we had a late lunch at Bonny’s, right off of I-45, Gulf Freeway…was great.  But, it was a miserable afternoon, misty rain and chilly.  As I mentioned below, I’m a certifed movie nut but had never been to an IMAX showing.  As well, I’d never seen a movie in 3D.  In light of all of the “fake” IMAXs that have popped up as of late, we wanted to make sure we did not fall victim a  small screen IMAX showing, hence our choice of venues.  We got our tickets online to assure seating and arrived 45 minites early for the 3:30 screening…it was a good thing we did for, though we had excellent seat right in the center about a third of the way down, the place filled almost completely up withing 15 minutes of our arrival.  While I used the rest room, my guy got into a conversation with another gentleman who said he’d been trying to see the move for three weeks but could never get a ticket, all sold out.  Anyway, there is only one word to describe the entire experience: magnificent!

The Edwards IMAX has the largest theatre screen in Houston…an astounding 80 feet wide and 65 high; it’s sound system has an amazing 12,000 watts of power for loud, yet crystal clear, sound.  It really borders on unbelievable how large 80 X 65 is, one simply has to see such to truely experience it…amazing.

As for Avatar itself?  Yes, indeed, not just a good movie, but a great one.  I’m not about to get into the underlying sociopolitical theme.  Most assuredly it has one, but the absolute truth is that all but a very, very few films, regardless of the format, theme, or subject matter all have some underlying sociopolitical point…and I get that…Avatar was no different than the rest in this regard.  But I watch movies for entertainment, and if Avatar is anything, it is hugely entertaining…hugely.  James Cameron, the producer/director, said he had been working on the Avatar concept since 1994, but the technology required to make his vision “needed to catch up” before he could undertake its production.  Well, believe me, the technology has certainly arrived.  Watching the movie, it was almost impossible to not feel you were literally on the planet Pandora, the film’s setting…the special effect were that real, that spectacular.  I could go on and on, but won’t.  The film is a must see…period.

After the movie, my guy and I found outselves in a downpour as we had to negotiate the 40 miles back down to where we live…at 6:30 in the evening, on a Friday night, in the kind of traffic indigenous to Houston and that makes me hate the city.  We decided to check out Kemah for dinner, settling on Joe’s Crab Shack as a second choice due to a fire in one of the other restaraunts that demanded the evacuation of fully half of the boardwalk.

As others have said in their reviews, Avatar is so spectacular that it is only after a bit of reflection that one really appreciates just how awesome a film it is.  Over dinner and a couple of bottles of Pinot Grigio we enjoyed critiquing the film.  Both he and I are engineers and we both had only one criticism of Avatar, if by any measure one could actually call it criticism.  Our one slight chuckle came with the choice of the word unobtainium for the product that was mined on Pandora.  As engineers, we are certainly familiar with the very real concept of unobtainium as a material, the word has been around for decades (Google it).  And, agreed that most would not pick up on the fallacy of the unobtainium concept, we both felt it was a poor choice for the name of the material the “corporation” was mining.  Like I said, hardly a criticism…more of an observation.

See the film…it’s super!

SA-ET

Though perhaps not known to many, I am somewhat of an incurable movie fanatic.  I’ve been that way since being a child growing up in a small town in rural Louisiana. 

Though it dates me, I can remember when movies ran for only a few days.  There was a movie that ran on Monday and Tuesday…one that ran Wednesday through Friday…one on Saturday…and one on Sunday…four different movies in one week…and every week, the movies changed.  That was the way it was back in small town, Last Picture Show Louisiana in the 1950s and early 60s.  It was the same for the Drive-Ins as well. 

Of course, I didn’t get to go to see all four movies, with school and all.  But, until I was about 15, on at least one day during the weekend (either the Saturday or the Sunday), going to the movies was the highlight of the week.  There were a lot of westerns, a lot of war movies, and a lot of high drama…it was a very innocent time.  I can still vividly remember one of my older brothers dropping me off at the picture show, as it was called.  I can even still remember some of the movies I saw. 

My mother would give me $.25 to go to the movie…rarely, if I was lucky, I got $.35 for the event.  Because I was under twelve years old, it cost only $.15 to get in.  Popcorn was $.10 and a fountain Coke, with ice, was also a dime; candy bars and other such delights were only a nickel.  If I got the thirty five cents I could get both popcorn and a coke, but getting the extra dime seldom occurred.  I got two Hershey bars most of the time…one with almonds, one without.  I was a very happy toad indeed. 

My joy at escaping to the movies never waned.  In my senior year of college I found myself in need of an additional three credit hours in order to graduate, a course known as a free elective.  I chose a 400 Level English course entitled Communication and Culture that was supposed to be what was called in the day a crip course…dumb brick easy…it was a film course.  The course was described to me by my BFF who worked in the English Department of the University of Southwestern Louisiana like this:

Read More »